Frederick Douglass’ narrative creates an argument about dignity by portraying his personal encounter with the many evils of slavery. Douglass effectively displays the nonchalant cruelty Mr. Covey beat him with; even in his evident exceedingly fable condition. Douglass presents Mr. Covey as the cold, iron hearted man that he truly is in order to highlight the truth that there was virtually no discrepancy between a slave and a man and effectively broadcast how inhumane and cruel slavery was. Douglass’ point is that slaves were consistently robbed of their dignity and forced to submit to their masters even if they are inherently incapable of laboring –in order to crush the little self-worth slaves possessed. I found it interesting that Mr. Covey refused to send Douglass to the whipping post in order to spare his dignity, when he often beat Frederick Douglass in an attempt to rob Douglass of his dignity. This truly shows that Mr. Covey is well aware of the concept of dignity and pride. In fact, Douglass states “it was of considerable importance” to Mr. Covey. Yet, Mr. Covey was still willing to deny Douglass of it – this really conveys the notion that slaves were not treated as human beings. By resisting, and ultimately physically retaliating against Mr. Covey , Douglass recalled [his] departed self-confidence. Douglass’ narrative contributes to historically important slave narratives by contributing his own unique experience with slavery. His testament promotes the idea that being a slave did not require the abandonment of total self-worth and dignity. This moment with Mr. Covey was certainly epoch and in the long run, what kindled Frederick Douglass’ life-long drive to continue fighting against slavery.